Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Forlorn Fimbul's avatar

I just wanted to say to everyone who has arrived here, read this article, commented and so on:

Thank you so much.

You will see that this is just a little citizen substack, if you look through it. I only started writing this way when I felt the call to it, in 2021, I haven't been doing this all that long.

It never occurred to me this article would resonate with so many people.

I'm very, very touched, not to mention relieved that I'm not the only one feeling this way, you can take that to the bank.

Thanks again!

Expand full comment
this little authoritarian's avatar

What troubles me the most was the lack of curiosity about "covid". The year leading up to the rollout of the shot, I wanted to know more about coronavirus research ( I was quite worried at the time) and the failed attempts at producing a vaccine. By the time the shots rolled out, I had read enough to seriously doubt claims that were being made. Granted, I had lots of time to read about this (and many did not) but family members showed no inclination to hear about what I had researched from me.

Now, I have learned a great deal more since then and my views on the pandemic have changed and been refined, but my rejection of the shots is still based on the core understanding of immunology that was known/accepted up till then (then suddenly dismissed) :

- serum antibodies elicited by intramuscular injection play no role in fighting an infection at the mucosa as they do not cross the mucosal barrier. That is the domain on T-cells, secretory igA and NK cells. Evidence of serum antibodies is not indicative of "immunity".

- There is no such thing as a "novel" coronavirus in the way they proposed (i.e. no one is immune) as they those RNA elements exist in a quasi-swarm which contain numerous, functionally constrained proteins shared across these "viruses". Exposure to all manner of these over one's life means immune systems develop memory to those (not just spike proteins, for example) and thus recognize many different variations. That doesn't mean you couldn't get sick, because such immunity to highly mutating viruses is not iron-clad in that sense, but they're also not lethal (unless your immune system is on its way out)

- mRNA vaccines are transfections and those have been used in laboratories for years as a way to see the effects of protein expression in mammals. Expression of foreign proteins initiates destruction of cells anywhere in the body.

-LNPs, the carrier of the mRNA, were designed to go anywhere in the body so the notion that they would stay in the muscle was an outright fabrication.

- Generally speaking the danger of viral infections lies in secondary bacterial infections, not viremia. Therefore, denial of antibiotics or steroidal treatment is guaranteed to worsen ANY respiratory infection.

Now, there is still a deeper debate to be had about whether RNA viruses are infectious in the way that has been asserted, or that they can even pandemic. The lab study of RNA viruses via circular DNA and RNA polymerase, they way PCR is used, etc all need to be highly scrutinized in terms of whether the foundation of virology is what they have asserted it to be, but regardless of that, the claims made early on weren't even based on the immunology that formed the backbone of the research then.

I don't know where the final actual truth lies but I do know that authorities LIED about many things that were known prior to covid and too many people showed no effing interest in understanding that.

They still haven't even 3 years later. It's pathetic.

Expand full comment
338 more comments...

No posts